|
|
wt/vol
|
MW/conc.
|
moles
|
density
|
equivs.
|
yield
|
|
I
|
4.452 g
|
162.18
|
0.0275
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
II
|
11 mL
|
2.5 M
|
0.0275
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
III
|
200 mL
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
IV
|
3.27 mL
|
171.04
|
0.0275
|
1.438
|
1.0
|
|
|
V
|
1.003 g
|
369.38
|
0.0027
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
VI
|
3.887 g
|
252.30
|
0.0154
|
|
|
(56%)
|
Procedure: 500 mL
1-neck flask, stirbar, septum, N2 inlet
Dissolved
4.452 g of diol I in 200 mL of dry
THF. Stirred; cooled to 0 C. Added 11.0 mL of n-BuLi
(2.5 M in hexanes). Obtained a
white precipitate. After 35 min,
3.27 mL of BnBr was added. After 4
h, TLC analysis showed only unreacted I
at Rf 0.37 (EtOAc, CAM). Added
1.003 g of Bu4NI. After
69 h at rt, TLC again showed only unreacted I. The
reaction mixture was then refluxed for 48 h. TLC analysis showed product spot at Rf 0.84 (EtOAc, CAM). The reaction was quenched with sat. aq.
NH4Cl and extracted with Et2O. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered
and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The product was isolated by flash chromatography on silica
gel using Et2O as eluant.
The product was a clear, pale yellow oil.
notes
Here, n-BuLi is used to deprotonate one of the hydroxyl
groups to afford the alkoxide which is insoluble in THF and precipitates. This allows for the protection of a single
hydroxyl group of the diol. The
stoichiometry and order of addition should be considered important; even though
the alkoxide precipitates it is still probably a good idea not to have excess
base around in the presence of either the diol or the alkoxide.