|
|
wt/vol
|
MW
|
moles
|
density
|
equivs.
|
yield
|
|
I
|
3.876 g
|
104.11
|
0.0372
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
II
|
12.292 g
|
274.87
|
0.0447
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
III
|
3.080 g
|
68.08
|
0.0452
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
IV
|
100 mL
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
V
|
12.495 g
|
342.52
|
0.0365
|
|
|
(98%)
|
Procedure: 250 mL
1-neck flask, stirbar, septum, N2 inlet
Dissolved
3.876 g of ester I and 12.292 g of II in 100 mL of dry DMF. The mixture was stirred at rt and 3.080 g of imidazole was
added. After 16 h, TLC showed
product spot at Rf 0.79 (3:7 EtOAc-hexanes, UV). The reaction mixture was then concentrated by rotary
evaporation. A white solid was
obtained which was triturated with ether and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated by rotary
evaporation and the product was isolated by flash chromatography on silica gel
using 1:9 EtOAc-hexanes as eluant.
The product was a clear, colorless oil.
1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz) d 7.67 (m, ArH, 4H), 7.40 (m,
ArH, 6H), 4.28 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, CH, 1H),
3.56 (s, CO2CH3, 3H), 1.37 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH3, 3H), 1.09 (s, SiC(CH3)3,
9H).
notes
The protection of an alcohol
using DPSCl most likely proceeds through an N-dimethyl-tert-butylsilylimidazole
intermediate as shown below. This
is the mechanism first proposed by Corey and Venkateswarlu for protections
involving TBSCl.